|
Background
Duranty and the NYTimes "Smoking Gun"
UCCA
President NYTimes Letter to the Editor
Download Duranty Demo Flyer
Email the NYTimes
Email the Pulitzer Committee
Famine Remembrance Week Schedule 2003
Holodomor Monument in
Washington DC
Famine Monument
Testimony
US Presidential
Famine Genocide Proclamations
2002 Commemoration
Links
Please Check Back Often - We're Always Updating and
Adding Information
|
|

|
Holodomor
The Ukrainian Famine-Genocide
|
Because the Holodomor, the Ukrainian Famine-Genocide
was carried out behind the Iron Curtain, it is one of the least known
crimes against humanity committed by the Stalinist government of the
former Soviet Union. Its magnitude is comparable to the Jewish Holocaust,
yet due to the isolation of the Soviet Union from the world for over 70
years and the intricate web of lies manufactured by Soviet historians, the
memory of this tragedy was suppressed and the evidence concealed. It is
the Ukrainian American community's duty to share this tragic page of
history with the world and ensure that the catastrophe that befell Ukraine
never happen again.
|
The Famine-Genocide of the Ukrainian nation occurred
as a result of a direct Soviet policy to crush the nationally conscious
Ukrainian people. By introducing unrealistically large quotas on grain
(accounting for 27% of the Soviet Union harvest, Ukraine was responsible
for 38% of the quotas) and other agricultural products, the Soviet
Government stripped the peasants of their food supply - causing a famine
that claimed the lives of between 7 to 10 million innocent victims.
In his book The Harvest of Sorrow,
British historian Robert Conquest provided a vivid picture of the
devastating effects of the Famine-Genocide in Ukraine: "A quarter of the
rural population, men, women, and children, lay dead or dying, the rest
in various stages of debilitation with no strength to bury their
families or neighbors."
|
|
In his book
The Harvest of Sorrow, British historian
Robert Conquest provided a vivid picture of the devastating effects
of the Famine-Genocide in Ukraine: "A quarter of the rural
population, men, women, and children, lay dead or dying, the rest in
various stages of debilitation with no strength to bury their
families or neighbors." |
|
|
Moreover, having officially sealed the borders of Ukraine
to prevent any migration or relief efforts, the Soviet government could
continue its barbarism without criticism from the outside world. In August
1932, members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) received
authorization to officially confiscate grain from peasant households. Later
that same month, a law that carried the death penalty for the theft of
"social property" was introduced. Thousands of starving people caught taking
even a handful of grain from a collective silo or farm were executed on the
spot. Under extenuating circumstances these so called "crimes against the
state" were punished by 10 years in Soviet labor camps.
|
At the height of the Famine:
Ukrainian villages were dying
at the rate of 25,000 per day or 1,000 per hour or 17 per minute;
The Soviet regime dumped 1.7
million tons of grain on the Western markets - nearly a quarter of a
ton of grain for every Ukrainian who starved to death;
Among the children, one in
three perished as a result of rapid collectivization and the forced
famine-genocide; and,
The 1933 Famine-Genocide was
geographically focused for political ends as it stopped precisely at
the Ukrainian-Russian ethnographic border
|
|
One in three children perished in the Holodomor |
|
This Soviet policy of terror was a political move aimed
at crushing the peasants and landowners - those who most fervently resisted
collectivization and supported the independence of Ukraine from the Soviet
Union.
|
|
The pre-meditated nature and the political motives of the
Soviets are apparent in the communist writings of the time. One of the
leading communist papers in Ukraine carried an article, which stated:
"collectivization in Ukraine has a special task … to destroy the social
basis of Ukrainian nationalism - individually owned peasant agriculture."
Stalin openly spoke of his plans to liquidate the individual farmers as a
class in a conversation with Winston Churchill stating, "… the Collective
Farm policy was a terrible struggle… Ten million. It was fearful. Four years
it lasted. It was absolutely necessary…" Based on this, it is obvious that
the goal of collectivization and the unrealistic agricultural quotas placed
on farmers were a means of totally eliminating the Ukrainian peasantry.
Nearly a forth of Ukraine's rural population paid with their lives because
of their desire for freedom. This heinous Soviet crime left a great wound in
the psychological and social development of the Ukrainian nation, which is
still felt today.
|
|
International Intervention at the Time of
Famine-Genocide
|
Regrettably, the world did not make any substantial
efforts to assist or relieve the Ukraine nation or dispute the genocidal
policies of the Soviets. The United States, in particular, did not
interfere due to the fact that the Great Depression fostered strong
sympathies towards the Soviet Union. Many Western intellectuals were not
ready to hear the truth, and thus ignored evidence of the Soviet
government's implementation of sadistic policies.
|
The general attitude of the democratic
Western states was similar to that expressed in a document compiled by the
British Foreign Service: "The truth of the matter is, of course, that we
have a certain amount of information about famine conditions in the south
of Russia [sic], similar to that which has appeared in the press … We do
not want to make it public, however, because the Soviet government would
resent it and our relations with them would be prejudiced."
|
|
We consider it an
outrage that a reporter who knowingly concealed an act of genocide
continues to be honored with journalism's highest honor. |
|
Furthermore, some prominent
journalists of the time, such as New York Times correspondent
Walter Duranty, aided the Soviets in concealing their crimes by
proliferating their propaganda in the West and slandering those who
reported on the Famine in Ukraine. Mr. Duranty was even awarded the
Pulitzer Prize for ‘Excellence in Journalism’ for his reports on the
Soviet Union and its "successful development," while in private
admitting that up to 10 million people might have starved to death.
|
|
Revoke
Walter Duranty's Pulitzer Prize!
|
|
The Ukrainian American community has initiated a campaign
to revoke Walter Duranty’s prestigious Pulitzer Prize awarded for
"excellence in journalism." We consider it an outrage that a reporter who
knowingly concealed an act of genocide continues to be honored with
journalism's highest honor. Moreover, in a recently published book by
Leonard Leshuk titled U.S. Intelligence Perceptions of Soviet Power:
1926-1946 the author provides evidence that Walter Duranty "admitted
to Mr. A.W. Klieforth of the U.S. Embassy in Berlin in June of 1931 that,
"in agreement between The New York Times and the Soviet authorities"
his dispatches reflected the official opinion of the Soviet regime and not
his own." It is time that the true history is revealed and the Pulitzer
Prize be revoked from a person who compromised his own moral principles and
those of his profession and entered into a pact with an evil and oppressive
regime. |
Unfortunately, the U.S. media
heavily influenced the opinions of U.S. intelligence, policy makers, and
the public, regarding the Soviet Union. Duranty's dispatches may have
influenced the U.S. government's formal recognition of the Soviet Union
in 1933 -- at the height of the Famine-Genocide. This official
recognition sanctioned Stalin's repressive regime, which led to decades
of continued brutality and the slaughter of untold millions.
|
|